I'm chillin' in the @Pixelmindai AMA space. @AdamBLevine said something about this AI generative art technology that hits on the ethics of what it means to be an artist/creator. Does the AI take away from the artist? My answer is no. I showed PixelMind to my uncle over ThanksDay.

He's an architect, so we fed KittyKitty some building challenges, and it crushed it. He flat out asked me when it would be available to use in his office. He immediately saw the use case where his crew could generate 10 AI samples for clients and use that "thingness" to do stuff.

Namely, they could iterate off the AI seeds to make an actual fucking building. If a "Boomer II" can see it, certainly we all can give it a shot.

Wingly thoughts!

Have some examples.